USPTO serial 74186165
KEMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAXLEY,ANDREW P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KEMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-6969 Hardheim, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John F. McNulty
JOHN F MCNULTY PAUL & PAULSTE 29002000 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machines for use in the ceramic and chemical processing industries; namely, crushing, mixing, comminuting, separating and feeder machines; conveyors and structural parts of the aforesaid machines and conveyors | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 1, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |