Drawing for BETTER BEEF CHOICE

USPTO serial 74186237

BETTER BEEF CHOICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BETTER BEEF CHOICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald P. Kananen

RONALD P KANANEN MARKS MURASE AND WHITESTE 7502001 L ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029fresh and processed meatsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 1997ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 13, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 1997CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 11, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 20, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 6, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 1995CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 28, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 18, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 1993CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 12, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 12, 1992ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 24, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 10, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance