USPTO serial 74186246
MICROMECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANCINI, CYNTHIA H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MICROMECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MICROSYSTEM CONTROLS PTY. LTD.
Jamisontown, New South Wales 2750, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel D. Fetterley
DANIEL D FETTERLEY ANDRUS, SCEALES, STARKE & SAWALL100 E WISCONSIN AVE #1100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | coin and token validation systems; coin and token sorting apparatus; coin and token discrimination apparatus; coin and token validation apparatus; mechanisms for coin-freed apparatus; counterfeit coin detectors; money counting and sorting machines; electrical and electronic apparatus included in class 9 for field programming of coin and token validators; parts of and accessories for aforementioned goods | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |