USPTO serial 74186332
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ray V. Hartwell, III
KRAFT FOODS INC3 LAKES DRNORTHFIELD, IL 60093-2753UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | packaged meals or side dishes composed primarily of pasta | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 26, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |