USPTO serial 74186379
USTRAVEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 5, 1997
- Examiner
- MERMELSTEIN, DAVID
- Law office
- OFFICE OF PUBLIC RECORDS - SPECIAL HANDLING SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with USTRAVEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rockville, MD
ROCKVILLE, MD
NORTHBROOK, IL
ROCKVILLE, MD
Rockville, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY HELEN SEARS
MARY HELEN SEARS THE M H SEARS LAW FIRM2300 N ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | travel agency services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 24, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by USTRAVEL SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by USTRAVEL SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BTI AMERICAS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PSG SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by USTRAVEL SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named USTRAVEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2004 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 8, 1998 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 21, 1997 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 13, 1997 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 10, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 31, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 8, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 7, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 26, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |