USPTO serial 74186564
TITAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TITAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ormand Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry J. Parker
BARRY J PARKER ROSENBLUM, PARISH, & ISAACS160 W SANTA CLARA STSAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | sunglasses | ABANDONED | Aug 21, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 1993 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 8, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 1993 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 29, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 1992 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 1992 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Jun 4, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |