Drawing for THE ENVIRO FAMILY

USPTO serial 74186766

THE ENVIRO FAMILY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FALK, ERIN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE ENVIRO FAMILY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas A. Kain

THOMAS A KAIN COLUCCI & UMANS101 E 52ND STNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009motion picture films and prerecorded video tapes in the areas of education, entertainment, religion, philosophy, adventure, animation, fantasy and environmental educationABANDONED—
016books; namely, fiction books, children's books, picture books, religious and spiritual books, books containing fairy tales, poetry books, adventure books, philosophical books and educational books; comic books, coloring books, mounted and unmounted photographs and cartoonsABANDONED—
028dolls and accessories therefor, doll houses and furnishings, doll cases and bags, and doll clothing; toys; namely, toy action figures and accessories therefor, stuffed toys, wind-up toys, beach balls, toy blocks, costume masks, face masks and puppets; games; namely, board games, card games, video game cartridges, manipulative games; sporting goods; namely, skateboards, ice skates and roller skatesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 1994ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 1994EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 1993EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 22, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 30, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 26, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 26, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance