Drawing for UV BLOCK

USPTO serial 74187098

UV BLOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1830032Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 5, 1994
Examiner
RUPP, TERRY
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UV BLOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gerald S. Schur

GERALD S SCHUR WELSH & KATZ LTD120 S RIVERSIDE PLZ 22ND FLCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing; namely, men's, women's and children's shirts, pants, shorts, jackets, play suits, jogging suits, hats and capsEXPIRED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2005CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
May 25, 2004PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
Apr 5, 200489AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Jun 2, 20008.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Apr 3, 2000COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Mar 16, 2000PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Nov 29, 1999815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Apr 5, 1994R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Feb 3, 1994CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Feb 3, 1994IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 3, 1994JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 11, 1993CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 2, 1993CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 21, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 26, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 18, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance