USPTO serial 74187575
OIL WELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OIL WELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kirk A. Kuhfeldt
KIRK A KUHFELDT KRASS & YOUNG3001 W BIG BEAVER RD STE 624TROY, MI 48084-3109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | automobile repair services--;namely, miscellaneous servicing and repairing of automotive vehicles, oil changes, lubrication and engine tune-up services | ABANDONED | May 10, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 22, 1993 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 22, 1993 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 28, 1993 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 7, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |