USPTO serial 74187802
POLARTEC THE CLIMATE CONTROL FABRIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, MARGARET
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POLARTEC THE CLIMATE CONTROL FABRIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lawrence, MA
BURLINGTON, VT
LAWRENCE, MA
LAWRENCE, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ernst B. Weglein
ERNST B WEGLEIN MALDEN MILLS INDUSTRIES, INC46 STAFFORD STP O BOX 809LAWRENCE, MA 01842Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | textile fabric piece goods and related articles for use in the manufacture of clothing | ABANDONED | Feb 25, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MALDEN MILLS INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AD PROPERTIES CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by MALDEN MILLS INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MALDEN MILLS INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named POLARTEC THE CLIMATE CONTROL FABRIC
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 10, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |