USPTO serial 74188333
GIANNI VALENTINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2130804Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 20, 1998
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GIANNI VALENTINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Florence Fashions (Jersey) Limited
St. Helier, Jersey, GB
Other trademarks owned by Florence Fashions (Jersey) Limited
Florence Fashions (Jersey) Limited
St. Helier, Jersey, GB
Other trademarks owned by Florence Fashions (Jersey) Limited
Florence Fashions (Jersey) Limited
St. Helier, Jersey, GB
Other trademarks owned by Florence Fashions (Jersey) Limited
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda K. McLeod
LINDA K MCCLEOD FINNEGAN FARABOW GARRETT & DUNNER LLP901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | attache cases; bandoliers, brief cases; garment bags for travel; handbags; straps for luggage; thongs; music cases, namely, a type of brief case designed to carry musical scores; pocket wallets; drawstring pouches; purses; rucksacks; satchels; school bags; travelling bags; individual pieces of luggage and luggage sets; cosmetic cases sold empty; cases for men's toiletries sold empty; valises; animal hides; trunks for travelling; umbrellas; parasols; walking sticks; whips; harnesses; and saddlery; all made of leather or imitation of leather | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Florence Fashions (Jersey) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Florence Fashions (Jersey) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Florence Fashions (Jersey) Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named GIANNI VALENTINO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2011 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1999 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 20, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 25, 1997 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 12, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 3, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 19, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 12, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 8, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 15, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 30, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1993 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Oct 14, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |