USPTO serial 74188705
COUNTRY CLASSICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COUNTRY CLASSICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James D. Hall
JAMES D HALL OLTSCH, KNOBLOCK & HALL, PCP O BOX 420SOUTH BEND, IN 46624UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | frozen prepared food products; namely, frozen main dish pie entrees consisting primarily of meat, turkey or chicken and also having vegetables and a frozen prepared dough | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 27, 1993 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 27, 1993 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 27, 1993 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 25, 1993 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 4, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |