USPTO serial 74189391
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROD S. BERMAN
ROD S BERMAN SPENSLEY, HORN, JUBAS & LUBITZFIFTH FL1880 CENTURY PARK ELOS ANGELES, CA 90067| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | consumer electronic products; namely, VCR programmer, hand-held electronic organizer, universal video/audio controller, telephone dialer, and reminder/telephone dialer | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 24, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 24, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 10, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 7, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 9, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |