Drawing for CHRISTIAN MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION

USPTO serial 74190329

CHRISTIAN MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHRISTIAN MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil F. Markva

NEIL F MARKVA8322-A TRAFORD LNSPRINGFIELD, VA 22152UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035publications, namely newsletters, pamphlets, leaflets, notebooks, catalogs, and instructional workbooks all dealing with business managementABANDONEDOct 17, 1990
041management educational services; namely, assisting others involved in the management of Christian churches and religious organizations through the conducting of seminars, conferences and meetingsABANDONEDOct 18, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 1996EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 21, 1995EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 14, 1995ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 16, 1994CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 11, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 1993JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 11, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 18, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance