USPTO serial 74190636
DYNEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUNN, ELIZABETH A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DYNEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin B. Pavane
MARTIN B PAVANE COHEN, PONTANI, LIEBERMAN & PAVANE551 FIFTH AVE STE 1210NEW YORK, NY 10176UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware; namely, personal computers | ABANDONED | Jul 31, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 26, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 26, 1994 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 4, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 1, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 13, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 28, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |