USPTO serial 74190865
BED-IN-A-BAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2003752Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 24, 1996
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- EXECUTIVE ACCESS
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BED-IN-A-BAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Danville, VA
JEOFFREY L. BURTCH, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY
WILMINGTON, DE
Other trademarks owned by JEOFFREY L. BURTCH, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY
AMERICAN TEXTILE INDUSTRIES, LLC
DULUTH, GA
Danville, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TERESA A. LEE
Teresa Lee Pryor Cashman LLP7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | bedding, namely, comforters, bed skirts, shams, sheets and pillowcases | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DAN RIVER INC.
- Other trademarks owned by JEOFFREY L. BURTCH, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN TEXTILE INDUSTRIES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by DAN RIVER INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named BED-IN-A-BAG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2018 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 27, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 18, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 18, 2006 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 18, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 3, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2002 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 1997 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 24, 1996 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 1, 1996 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 18, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 23, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 12, 1995 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 1993 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Apr 30, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 8, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 1993 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Aug 28, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |