USPTO serial 74192790
BILL BLASS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BILL BLASS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sue Nam
Legal Manager, Brands NexCen Brands, Inc.1330 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | document business cases, attache briefcases, travel bags, luggage, luggage tags, backpacks and tote bags | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 26, 1995 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 1995 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 1994 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 11, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |