USPTO serial 74193576
SILK BLUES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1906918Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 18, 1995
- Examiner
- MELTZER, ELEANOR
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SILK BLUES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CLAIRE M. KIMBALL
CLAIRE M KIMBALL ALSTON AND BIRD LLP1201 W PEACHTREE STONE ATLANTIC CTRATLANTA, GA 30303-3424Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | wearing apparel, namely denim products in the nature of pants, shorts and slacks, not containing silk | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 5, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TROPICAL GARMENT MANUFACTURING CO.
- Other trademarks owned by TSI BRANDS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PEI LICENSING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TROPICAL GARMENT MANUFACTURING CO.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SILK BLUES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2006 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 30, 1995 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 1995 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 24, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 20, 1995 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jul 15, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 1, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 30, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 1992 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| May 28, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |