USPTO serial 74193672
WITNESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 10, 1993
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WITNESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
JACQUES BOGART INTERNATIONAL B.V.
3016 DE ROTTERDAM, NL
JACQUES BOGART INTERNATIONAL B.V.
3016 DE ROTTERDAM, NL
JACQUES BOGART INTERNATIONAL B.V.
3016 DE ROTTERDAM, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil F. Greenblum
NEIL F GREENBLUM AND BRUCE H BERNSTEIN GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN, PLC1950 ROLAND CLARKE PLRESTON, VA 20191UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfumes and toilet water; cosmetics and toiletries; namely, blushers, eye shadows, foundation, makeup, facial masks, lipsticks, nail polishes, nail polish removers, body lotions, body creams, skin cleansing lotions, hair shampoos, bath salts and gels, bubble baths, body soaps and toilet soaps, hair oils, hair lotions, shaving soaps, shaving creams, and foams, aftershave lotions and balms, toothpaste, sun screen preparations; namely, oils, milks, lotions and creams, skin tanning creams; non-medicated face and skin care products; namely, toning lotions and creams, exfoliating creams and body deodorants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JACQUES BOGART INTERNATIONAL B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by JACQUES BOGART INTERNATIONAL B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by JACQUES BOGART INTERNATIONAL B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named WITNESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 10, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 16, 1993 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 24, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 1, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |