Drawing for WHEAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

USPTO serial 74196302

WHEAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHEAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William B. Kircher

WILLIAM B KIRCHER KOKJER, KIRCHER, BOWMAN & JOHNSON2414 COMMERCE TWR911 MAIN STKANSAS CITY, MO 64105-2074

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001products derived from grain; namely, modified and unmodified wheat starch and wheat glutenABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 17, 1995ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 17, 1995EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 27, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 25, 1993CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 15, 1993ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 16, 1993REINREINSTATED—
Sep 13, 1993JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 13, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 6, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 9, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance