USPTO serial 74196817
BUENDIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUENDIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
M.G. INDUSTRIAL DE ALIMENTOS, S.A. DE C.V.
Col. Apatlaco, Mexico City, MX
Other trademarks owned by M.G. INDUSTRIAL DE ALIMENTOS, S.A. DE C.V.
M.G. INDUSTRIAL DE ALIMENTOS, S.A. DE C.V.
Col. Apatlaco, Mexico City, MX
Other trademarks owned by M.G. INDUSTRIAL DE ALIMENTOS, S.A. DE C.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David S. Abrams
DAVID S ABRAMS ROYLANCE ABRAMS BERDO & GOODMAN1225 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | powdered mix used in the preparation of fruit flavored drinks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 15, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 22, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 22, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 19, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |