Drawing for ISAT

USPTO serial 74197202

ISAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1786518Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 10, 1993
Examiner
RATTNER, HEIDI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ISAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM H. HOLT

WILLIAM H HOLT1423 POWHATAN ST #2ARLINGTON, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer-based electronic fail-safe monitoring and protection controls and software for use as safety installations for monitoring operations of plants and processes and for intervening to prevent a hazardous state from being reachedEXPIRED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2004CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
May 7, 2002C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 9, 1999815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Aug 10, 1993R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 18, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 17, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 16, 1993CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 1, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 1991AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance