USPTO serial 74197707
ISM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ISM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario L5K 1B1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip J. Zadeik
PHILIP J ZADEIK BAKER & MCKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZ130 E RANDOLPH DRCHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | information systems management; namely, computer processing for others, computer consultation, computer software and system design for others, facilities management, computer system design, integration, installation and training | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2000 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 11, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1995 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |