USPTO serial 74197785
5TH DIMENSION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWE, ROBERT J.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 5TH DIMENSION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter M. Eichler
PETER M EICHLER BAKER & HOSTETLER600 WILSHIERE BLVD 12TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, headwear and footwear; namely, T-shirts, sweat shirts and pants, jerseys, shorts, jackets, hats, caps, scarves, gloves, hosiery, neckties, pajamas, robes, night shirts, underwear, head bands, wrist bands, swimsuits, skirts, shirts, tank tops, pants, coats, sweaters, leotards, leg warmers, stockings, panty hose, tights, belts, shoes, athletic shoes, slippers, boots, sandals and rainwear | ABANDONED | Jul 22, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 8, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1995 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 1995 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 1994 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 16, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |