USPTO serial 74197833
THE KIDS NUTRITION BAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 15, 1994
- Examiner
- SEEGARS, GERALD C.
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE KIDS NUTRITION BAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cato, NY
Cato, NY
American Nutrition Incorporated
St. Charles, IL
International Market Concepts Incorporated
St. Charles, IL
Other trademarks owned by International Market Concepts Incorporated
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Wall
LEONARD SCHMIDT, PRESIDENT RR34INCREDA-MEAL, INCCATO, NY 13033UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | candy bar consisting primarily of chocolate, whole dry milk, peanut butter, nuts, diced fruit, yogurt, honey, peanuts and raisins | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Increda-Meal, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Increda-Meal, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by American Nutrition Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by International Market Concepts Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named THE KIDS NUTRITION BAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 8, 2014 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 8, 2000 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1994 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 24, 1993 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 21, 1993 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 1993 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 23, 1993 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 10, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 1991 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 12, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |