Drawing for MICRO-RETRACTOR

USPTO serial 74198141

MICRO-RETRACTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MICRO-RETRACTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles N. Quinn

CHARLES N QUINN DANN, DORFMAN, HERRELL & SKILLMANSTE 7201601 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2307

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010surgical clampsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 22, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 3, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 3, 1994EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 20, 1994CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 11, 1994EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 5, 1994ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 13, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 24, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 1992ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 30, 1992JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 22, 1992JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 28, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 29, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 27, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance