USPTO serial 74200236
EPILADY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EPILADY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mobil Post Upper Galilee 12 225, IL
Mobil Post Upper Galilee 12 225, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James D. Halsey, Jr.
JAMES D HALSEY JR STAAS & HALSEY700 ELEVENTH ST NW STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | essential and aromatic oils for personal use; perfumes; skin soaps, hair lotions; namely, hair styling preparations; all purpose cleaning preparations; cosmetics; namely, cleaners, creams and lotions; pumice and buffing stones for skin care; and, depilatory creams | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | electric hair curlers, electric hair detanglers, cordless electric hair detangler brushes, electric grooming combs, and battery operated combs and brushes | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | electric and water-powered body massagers and electric body brushes | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | handheld electric hair dryers, portable facial saunas; and power massage systems comprised essentially of telephone showerheads, brushes, structural parts and fittings therefor | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | combs and brushes; namely, hair combs, hair brushes, cosmetic brushes and body brushes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mepro Epilady Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Mepro Epilady Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named EPILADY
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 4, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 4, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 6, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |