USPTO serial 74200599
MATIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CATALDO, PETER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MATIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LORIENT 56100, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard C. Harris
RICHARD C HARRIS STEVENS, DAVIS, MILLER & MOSHER515 N WASHINGTON STP O BOX 1427ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | electric lighting fixtures; lamp shades; lampshade holders; lamps; sides of bathtubs; toilet seats | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | furniture parts; wall plaques; cupboards; sideboards; benches; infant cradles; bed frames made of wood, plastic, cork, reed, cane, wicker, fiberglass, and substitutes therefor; wood furniture partitions; wood boxes; plastic boxes; buffets; desks; busts made from wood, wax, plaster or plastic; picture frames; picture frame moldings; furniture chests; furniture cabinets; jewel cases not made of precious metal; tea carts; couches; fire screens for domestic use; folding furniture screens; statuettes made form wood, wax, plaster or plastic; fitted chair covers; garden furniture; funiture mirrors; doors for furniture; flower pot pedestals made of wood, cork, plastics, reed, cane, wicker and substitutes therefor; window blinds; dressing tables; furniture display cabinets | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | sides of wash basins | ABANDONED | — |
| 024 | bed covers; namely, blankets; fabric made of cotton, wool, synthetic materials, fiberglass, linen; fustian; upholstery fabric; fitted plastic furniture covers; fabric for furniture covers made of cotton, wool, synthetic materials, fiberglass, linen; curtains; tapestry-style wall hangings made of cotton; furniture covers; non-fitted chair covers | ABANDONED | — |
| 027 | wall paper tapestry-style wall hangings not of textile; floor coverings; namely, linoleum, carpets, rugs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MATIS
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named MATIS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 1992 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |