Drawing for MATIS

USPTO serial 74200600

MATIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CATALDO, PETER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MATIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard C. Harris

RICHARD C HARRIS STEVENS, DAVIS, MILLER & MOSHER515 N WASHINGTON STP O BOX 1427ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020furniture parts; wall plaques; cupboards; sideboards; benches; infant cradles; bed frames made of wood, plastic, cork, reed, cane, wicker, fiberglass, and substitutes therefor; wood furniture partitions; wood boxes; plastic boxes; buffets; desks; busts made from wood, wax, plaster or plastic; picture frames; picture frame moldings; furniture chests; furniture cabinets; jewel cases not made of precious metal; tea carts; couches; fire screens for domestic use; folding furniture screens; statuettes made from wood, wax, plaster or plastic; fitted chair covers; garden furniture; furniture mirrors; doors for funiture; flower pot pedestals made of wood, cork, plastics, reed, cane, wicker and substitutes therefor; window blinds; dressing tables; furniture display cabinetsABANDONED—
024bed covers; namely, blankets; fabric made of cotton, wool, synthetic materials, fiberglass, linen; fustian; upholstery fabric; fitted plastic furniture covers; fabric for furniture covers made of cotton, wool, synthetic materials, fiberglass, linen; curtains; tapestry-style wall hangings made of cotton; furniture covers; non-fitted chair coversABANDONED—
027wall paper tapestry-style wall hangings not of textile; floor coverings; namely, linoleum, carpets, rugsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 21, 1993ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 21, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 10, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance