USPTO serial 74200740
INFOLINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SARAI, BALDEV
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INFOLINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NORMAN H. BEITNER
NORMAN H BEITNER HONIGMAN, MILLER, SCHWARTZ AND COHN2290 FIRST NATIONAL BLDGDETROIT, MI 48226-3583UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs for image processing, document management, production of digitized engineering records and production of digitized maintenance manuals | ABANDONED | Apr 30, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 9, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 9, 1995 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 9, 1995 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |