Drawing for DECO-LINING

USPTO serial 74203007

DECO-LINING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DECO-LINING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Louis M. Heidelberger

LOUIS M HEIDELBERGER REED, SMITH, SHAW & MCCLAY2500 ONE LIBERTY PL1650 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7301

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024textile drapery liningABANDONEDNov 1, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 18, 1995ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 17, 1995EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 2, 1994CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 31, 1993CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 21, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 2, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 11, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 7, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 18, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance