USPTO serial 74203509
MUSICDOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MUSICDOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori N. Boatright
LORI N BOATRIGHT BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | games and toys; namely, action figures and accessories therefor, plush toys, board games, dolls, soft sculpture toys, card games, video game machines, computer game equipment comprising computer hardware and software, video game cartridges, action skill games, manipulative games, toy vehicles, baby toys, squirt toys, toy guns and yo-yos | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MUSICDOME VENTURES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Eric/Chandler Ltd., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Eric/Chandler Ltd., Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named MUSICDOME
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 3, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 1995 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 1995 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Nov 15, 1994 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 1994 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 30, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 7, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 1, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |