USPTO serial 74203573
PEBBLE BEACH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PEBBLE BEACH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Drummond
WILLIAM H DRUMMOND FULWIDER, PATTON, LEE & UTECHT510 HARBOR BANK BLDG11 GOLDEN SHORE, P O BOX 22615LONG BEACH, CA 90801-5615Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | flower seeds | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 12, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 12, 1993 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 2, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |