USPTO serial 74203694
CREST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITAKER, LAURIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CREST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Larry Glenn Ball
LARRY GLENN BALL SPRADLING, ALPERN, FRIOT & GUM101 PARK AVE STE 700OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73102-7283UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | industrial and automotive products; namely, antifreeze/coolant, windshield washer antifreeze, brake fluid, power steering fluid, power steering sealer and conditioner, transmission sealer and conditioner, octane booster, fuel injector cleaner, carburetor and choke cleaner, gas treatment, lead substitute, fuel system and gas line antifreeze, and solvent | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1970 |
| 004 | refined petroleum and other industrial, automotive and lubricating products; namely, motor oil, automatic transmission fluid, detergent motor oil, hydraulic oil, tractor fluid, gear lubricants, chain oil, drip oil, rock drill oil, gas and fuel treatments, fuel injector, carburetor and choke cleaner, power steering and transmission sealer and conditioner, solvent and oil and grease obsorbent | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1970 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |