USPTO serial 74203800
LUQUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUQUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles R. Reeves
CHARLES R REEVES WOODARD, EMHARDT, NAUGHTON, MORIARTY& MCNETT BANK ONE CTR TWR111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5137Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | goods in the medical field; namely, for plates, screws, rings and other components used in surgical implant systems particularly involving the spine, and for application tools and instruments; namely, surgical hand tools and clamps | ABANDONED | May 12, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 31, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 31, 1995 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 31, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 28, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |