USPTO serial 74204168
WESTCOTT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 21, 1993
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WESTCOTT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St. Louis, MO
St. Louis, MO
St. Louis, MO
Moran Group, Incorporated, The
St. Louis, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard E. Haferkamp
RICHARD E HAFERKAMP ROGERS, HOWELL & HAFERKAMPPIERRE LACLEDE CTR7733 FORSYTH BLVD STE 1400ST LOUIS, MO 63105-1817Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | vinegar | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 9, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Moran Holding Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Moran Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Moran Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Moran Group, Incorporated, The
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named WESTCOTT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2000 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 21, 1993 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 16, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 1993 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 1993 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 10, 1993 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |