Drawing for BRID 'N' TECH

USPTO serial 74204658

BRID 'N' TECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1866404Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 6, 1994
Examiner
BONNET, ODETTE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRID 'N' TECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024solid non-porous film, sold as an integral component of textile fabrics for use in the manufacture of clothingSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2001C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Jul 11, 2001C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Dec 6, 1994R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 13, 1994CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jun 24, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 19, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 1993SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 27, 1993EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 26, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 1993EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 5, 1993IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 20, 1992NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 28, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 21, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 23, 1991CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 2, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance