USPTO serial 74204702
KITCHENETICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KITCHENETICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lester K. Essig
LESTER K ESSIG RAY, QUINNEY & NEBEKERP O BOX 45385SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84145-0385UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | electric domestic foodstuff processing machines; namely, bread makers, kneaders, blenders, mixers, liquefiers, whisks, juicers, food processors (for use in cutting, shredding, slicing, dicing and grating), food presses, meat and food grinders, spice mills, grain mills, food stuffers, pasta makers, and pastry and cookie makers | ABANDONED | Apr 29, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 8, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 1995 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 12, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |