USPTO serial 74204918
RESTORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 7, 1995
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RESTORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
WILMINGTON, DE
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Wilmington, DE
Other trademarks owned by E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cincinnati, OH
Wilmington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK J. GUNDERSEN
MARK J GUNDERSEN DCV3521 SILVERSIDE RDSTE 2K - QUILLEN BLDGWILMINGTON, DE 19810Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | laxatives | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 5, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INAGRA
- Other trademarks owned by INAGRA
- Other trademarks owned by DCV, INC
- Other trademarks owned by E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
- Other trademarks owned by InAgra Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by INAGRA
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named RESTORE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2005 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 21, 2001 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 11, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 9, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 1994 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 11, 1994 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 29, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 1993 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |