USPTO serial 74205128
WILDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POMPEY, TINA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WILDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
6229 Walluf, Rheingau, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta Jacobs-Meadway
ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY PANITCH SCHWARZE JACOBS & NADEL1601 MARKET ST 36TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemical products; namely, resins in a raw state, curable single and multi-containing materials in a raw state and as semi-finished products, and other chemical products for use in odontology, dentistry, dental prosthetics, surgery, and orthodontics, used in the manufacture of and used as imbedding, duplicating, modeling and filling material, bonding agents, bonding cements, abrasive agents, disinfectants, etching and sealing agents for treatment of dental surfaces, as well as dental resins and ceramics for fabrication of crowns, bridges, orthodontic appliances and dentures; casting, sealing and insulating materials for dental technical purposes | ABANDONED | Jun 14, 1989 |
| 005 | dental impression materials; namely, resins and other chemical products used in the manufacture of and/or used as dental impression materials | ABANDONED | Jun 14, 1989 |
| 010 | dental instruments and appliances; namely, rotary instruments for dental purposes; namely, dental drills; manual and mechanical appliances for the processing of dental material; namely, UVA fluorescent light curing units, stroboscopic light curing units, porcelain furnaces and ovens; metal or resin holding devices for work pieces during processing, flax, imbed molds as auxiliaries for dental, technical, histological and metallurgical purposes; artificial teeth, crowns for teeth, bridges, orrhodontic appliances and dentures; artificial limbs and their parts, radiation units and light units for polymerization of resins and mixing and dosing appliances for odontological, dental, technical, histological and metallurgical purposes; discs as part of laboratory machines; namely, in dental laboratories | ABANDONED | Jun 14, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 1991 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |