USPTO serial 74205929
CALCIUM CRIMSON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CALCIUM CRIMSON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Allegra J. Helfenstein
ALLEGRA J HELFENSTEIN MOLECULAR PROBES, INCP O BOX 22010EUGENE, OR 97402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | synthetic organic reagent used for the quantitation of free calcium ion levels by measurement of fluorescence emission in the red color range | ABANDONED | Apr 26, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 9, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 18, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 18, 1994 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 26, 1993 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 16, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |