USPTO serial 74206168
PHOENIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THAYER, GARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PHOENIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Edmonton, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W.R. Langton
DAVID W R LANGTON ROGERS, BERESKIN & PARRSTE 4000 BOX 401 SCOTIA PLZ40 KING ST WTORONTO, ON M5H 3Y2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and software for general ledger, accounts payable, accounts receivable, payroll, personnel and human resource applications | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 1994 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |