Drawing for LIGHT. MADE RIGHT.

USPTO serial 74206172

LIGHT. MADE RIGHT.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BATTLE, KENNETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIGHT. MADE RIGHT.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035promoting public awareness of lighting products and services in print and broadcast advertising, trade shows, point-of-purchase displays, videos, and transportation graphicsABANDONEDOct 1, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 1994ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 1, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 7, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 1, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 1993CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 27, 1993UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 1992UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance