USPTO serial 74206736
MINIKNIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 21, 1993
- Examiner
- CHILDRESS, J.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MINIKNIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Uxbridge, MA
North Uxbridge, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard L. Stevens
RICHARD L STEVENS SAMUELS, GAUTHIER & STEVENS225 FRANKLIN STBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machine parts; namely, knives for use in granulators | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 27, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 21, 1993 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 18, 1993 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 1993 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 13, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1993 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 19, 1993 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 4, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |