Drawing for FRONTRUNNER

USPTO serial 74207011

FRONTRUNNER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRONTRUNNER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ellsworth R. Roston

ELLSWORTH R ROSTON ROSTON & SCHWARTZ, PC5900 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1430LOS ANGELES, CA 90036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009multirate standalone or integral digital modemABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 10, 1995ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 7, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 7, 1995EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 22, 1994CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 17, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 1993JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 23, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 10, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance