USPTO serial 74207017
GO MEXICO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GO MEXICO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Koch
ROBERT J KOCH FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI801 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | travel wholesale services; namely, providing information about destinations, and selling tourism services consisting of hotel accommodations, bus excursions, and sightseeing tours to tour operators and travel agencies; tour operator services and receptive agent services; namely, providing information about travel, tours and destinations and providing and arranging travel services consisting of tours, hotel accommodations, airline tickets, bus excursions, sightseeing tours, and meet and greet and transfer services to travel agencies and to the general public; and tour wholesaler services; namely, developing and marketing destinations and travel tours consisting of hotel accommodations, bus excursions, sightseeing tours, flight arrangements and airline tickets directly to tour operators, travel agencies and the general public | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 24, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 31, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 13, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 12, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 28, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 1993 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |