USPTO serial 74207188
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew J. Sherman
ANDREW J SHERMAN SILVER, FREEDMAN & TAFF1735 EYE ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | seasoned and non-seasoned dry and uncooked and cooked macaroni products; namely, linguine, fettuccine, spaghetti, ziti, shells, elbows, capellini, vermicelli, spaghettini, bucatini, bucati, maccheroncini, napoletani, tagliatelle, fettucce, tripoline, margherite, mafaldine, lasagne, piombino, pepi di bucatino, stelline, risino, lingue di passero, numeri e alfabeto, fili d'oro, occhi di pernice, anelli lisci, tubettini, ditalini rigati, ditali elicoidali, picolissimi, ditali rigati, ditalini, ditali, ditaloni, mezze millerighe, fagiolini, magliette di bucato, magliette di maccheroncino, magliette di napoli, magliette di zito, mezze penne, penne, penne di zito, magliettine rigate, magliette rigate, elicoidali, millerighe, penne rigate, conchigliette lisce, conchigliette rigate, conchiglie rigate, gnocchetti sardi, farfalle, farfalline, funghetti, soprese, gnocchi, bruchi lisci, lumachine, lumache, fusilli, cavatappi, nidi di capelli d'angelo, nidi di tagliolini, spaccatelle, genovesi lisci, gomiti, maccheroncelli, nidi di tagliatelle, nidi di tripoline | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 26, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 25, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 27, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |