USPTO serial 74207276
ZEUSCOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SARAI, BALDEV
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZEUSCOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas I. Rozsa
THOMAS I ROZSA IMPERIAL BANK BLDGSTE 108115303 VENTURA BLVDSHERMAN OAKS, CA 91403Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | business and personal computer products and components; namely, workstations, motherboards, computer peripheral cards, monitors, printers, plotters, modems, mouses, scanners, digitizers, uninterruptable power supplies and keyboards, power supplies, hard disk drives, floppy drives, tape drives and optical drives, BIOS (Basic Input Output System) chips, chipsets, ROM (Read Only Memory) chips, and ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuit) chips, PROM (Programmable Read Only Memory) chips, EPROM (Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory) chips, and PLD (Programmable Logic Device) chips, and training materials in electronic and printed formats; namely, instruction manuals and hard and floppy computer discs sold together with the foregoing | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 19, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 8, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |