Drawing for WORLDCLASS INDUSTRIES INC.

USPTO serial 74207335

WORLDCLASS INDUSTRIES INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WORLDCLASS INDUSTRIES INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas C. Wettach

THOMAS C WETTACH REED SMITH SHAW & MCCLAYP O BOX 2009PITTSBURGH, PA 15230UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040metal strip treating and finishingABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 1993PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 25, 1993ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 27, 1993PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Jan 27, 1993PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 1993CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 2, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 4, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance