Drawing for THE SOFTWARE DESIGN STUDIOS

USPTO serial 74207936

THE SOFTWARE DESIGN STUDIOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 608
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE SOFTWARE DESIGN STUDIOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dennis H Lambert

DENNIS H LAMBERT DENNIS H LAMBERT & ASSOCIATES7000 VIEW PARK DRBURKE, VA 22015UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software in the field of education; namely, software for assisting college students in different areas of learning and developmentABANDONED—
028computer gamesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 12, 1997PR.DPETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED—
Jul 24, 1997PRIMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED—
Feb 14, 1997PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 1996ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 8, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 1996SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 28, 1995IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 9, 1995EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 1995EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 2, 1995EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 28, 1994EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 31, 1994EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 1994EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 7, 1994EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 1993EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 3, 1993EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 1993EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 29, 1992NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 6, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 4, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 4, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 28, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance